The whole world is tuned to one channel. I need a second channel to escape to at least for a bit to not go crazy.
Anyone want to talk about game design? Ask me anything? Cite your evidence I'm a nutcase?

@paulczege here’s a question that keeps befuddling me. I’m in the old D&D camp, combat is a thing but I would like it to be quick (like, two or three “rounds” if the game has rounds). Game mechanics that work well for up to five characters start breaking down when playing with seven or eight characters; in one campaign I sometimes have fifteen characters total (five or six player characters + entourage). I’m currently writing up a simple 2d6 system… how to solve this?
1/2 cont

@paulczege 2/3
So the basic rules are in this pdf:
Essentially combat is a long string of one-on-one 2d6 vs rolls with the difference indicating who deals how much damage and allowing them to “keep the initiative” meaning they nominate who goes next and thus enabling them to pick the kind of attack they want to do.
Yesterday, they fought an Ettin and it took very long and it didn’t threaten them. So now I’m looking for a simple idea that would fit.

@paulczege 3/3
So: should the ettin impose extra conditions if it hits by a large margin, like a spell? Should large monsters have less hits? Bigger bonuses mean they win more often, dealing damage, and keeping the initiative so it quickly feels very, very dangerous. But adding more hits just makes the fight take longer. So, treat big monsters like obstacles? Do you climb the ettin to slay it?
Looking for brainstorming ideas and pointers. If you still need a distraction. 😅


Okay, here's my idea. Give monsters a "recipe" of certain kinds of attacks it takes to kill them. An ettin might take a "suprise attack" (one rolled with Dex instead of Strength) plus a "heavy strike", but maybe a couple of successful regular attacks is enough for players to keep the initiative until they get to it. A group of goblins might take a "mook flurry". A dragon might take ...

...a sequence of successful "overstrike" attacks (where a player rolls better than the attack by the prior player).

@paulczege Thanks! That’s an interesting idea and might provide a “Shadow of Colossus” kind of feel where you have to climb the giant (or do something else that’s crazy) in order to kill it.

@kensanata @paulczege what about using the "Boss Monsters" approach of Whitehack? Breaking up stats into phases, a few other features like different specials, etc?

@starmonkey I haven’t read Whitehack. Do you have a link to a review or so that talks about this?

Sign in to participate in the conversation

A Mastodon instance for tabletop gamers.