Context drives human behavior. We know Monopoly isn't a roleplaying game, so we don't roleplay its pieces having conversation as they pass each other on the board.

(Though my son used to when he was six. Children are driven by different contexts than the ones they'll learn by adulthood.)

Video game players assume incongruous or anomalous elements might need to be puzzled out. They'll poke at them to try and figure them out.

But RPG gamers would never approach an RPG text like this. There's no context for it. An RPG text is supposed to aspire to clarity. Any oblique or intuition-defying elements are reckoned and tolerated as unintended creative or communicative failings.

@paulczege Or to put it another way: most roleplayers have a skeletal default rpg framework in mind into which they fit the games they play. This framework is useful when it bridges gaps inherent in most traditional rpgs. The challenge for indie rpgs is to make clear how they re-write and override these assumptions, but being clear is not always what a particular game needs to achieve its own agenda.


I'm personally in this place with The Clay that Woke: I love the obliqueness of the game and the sense that it is trying to do something different, but I know that I need to sit down with it and spend some time figuring out how to make it work if I'm not going to default to rewriting it as I play.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

A Mastodon instance for tabletop gamers.