Datenparallele Typen in C++26: Bedingte Ausführung von Operationen

Dank std::simd_mask ist es in C++26 möglich, Operationen auf data-parallel types bedingt auszuführen.

https://www.heise.de/blog/Datenparallele-Typen-in-C-26-Bedingte-Ausfuehrung-von-Operationen-10485650.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

Can you recommend a CC-BY 4.0-compatible #license that allows training ai models only under the condition that the training data and model weights are published under a #CC license? #openaccess #opendata

Alright, y’all. Follow-up on this poll as promised…

Creative Commons published it. Afterward they shared their perspective on AI vs CC content. In short, “to get a sense of the various views on this question, we launched a Twitter poll where nearly half of respondents said, ‘it depends.’ We agree.”

https://creativecommons.org/2021/03/04/should-cc-licensed-content-be-used-to-train-ai-it-depends/

They made some questionable comments about it…

1/3

#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #CC #ContentLicense #CreativeCommons #AITheft #EatTheRich
https://mas.to/@markwyner/114782533726610769

copyleft-next contributor, @bkuhn, posted his views on @creativecommons's Attribution-Share-Alike license. He explains why he doesn't believe #CC-BY-SA is actually a #coypleft license.

https://lists.copyleft.org/pipermail/next/2025q3/000016.html

“Source code provisions” are an essential aspect of copyleft licenses — even for those designed for non-software works.

Much work remains to determine how to draft a “source code provision” for non-software. Copyleft-next hopes to get there eventually. Maybe #CreativeCommons could help!

Creative Commons Open Ed group have been working on an 'AI Ecosystem Framework', known as "CC-Signals". Check out the Github discussion space (so, not using an OS platform) for CC-Signals. The tone is less than positive. #cc #creativecommons #academia #education

creativecommons cc-signals · D...

Datenparallele Typen in C++26: ein Beispiel aus der Praxis

C++26 bekommt Funktionen zum Arbeiten mit datenparallelen Typen (SIMD). Ein Beispiel zeigt den praktischen Einsatz.

https://www.heise.de/blog/Datenparallele-Typen-in-C-26-ein-Beispiel-aus-der-Praxis-10464038.html?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.mastodon.mastodon.md_beitraege.md_beitraege&utm_source=mastodon

re: my post earlier about #cc #creativecommons #signals ...
this article is from almost a year ago but came across it via the wikipedia page for robots.txt

https://www.404media.co/websites-are-blocking-the-wrong-ai-scrapers-because-ai-companies-keep-making-new-ones/

lets be real. just like in meatspace, there will be no law or regulation that is going to fix this issue. we need dirtier tactics. a world that is safe from climate destroying, anti-social ai is a world that rids itself of it.

okay fedi, i finally caught up a little on the #cc #creativecommons #signals thing.

so like... there just isn't going to be a CC-NFAI (No Fucking AI) option? CC's idea of being proactive is helplessly embracing this shit and then asking the owners of AI scrapers to pretty please give credit and maybe some money based on *their* financial means? I wouldn't say this to a fellow human under normal circumstances but with respect to AI scrapers, how about fuck your financial means, you should have asked the price before you stole my shit?

Also, maybe I'm misunderstanding the whole thing, so feel free to clarify anything I stated incorrectly.

https://creativecommons.org/2025/06/25/introducing-cc-signals-a-new-social-contract-for-the-age-of-ai/

https://creativecommons.org/ai-and-the-commons/cc-signals/

https://creativecommons.org/ai-and-the-commons/cc-signals/implementation/

I understand that Creative Commons is just a licensing framework. I don’t expect the organization to champion my art, to recognize the value of my work, or to offer thanks — that's never been the point.

But if CC becomes a label that, through initiatives like these "signals", effectively tells the world, "These are the artists who are fine with being exploited", then something has gone terribly wrong.

https://github.com/creativecommons/cc-signals/discussions/21

#CreativeCommons:

#Framework für offenes #KI-Ökosystem angekündigt.

Mit dem Projekt #CC Signals sollen Inhaber von #Datensätzen detailliert angeben können, wie Inhalte beim #KI-Training verwendet werden dürfen.

https://www.golem.de/news/creative-commons-framework-fuer-offenes-ki-oekosystem-angekuendigt-2506-197511.html

Exciting new horrors for us to confront: the #CreativeCommons organization has decided, inexplicably, to roll out some kind of "pro AI scraping" signals in web requests - based on an expectation of "good faith" from those doing the scraping (????)

This is such a boneheaded decision, and I hope everyone rightfully blasts them for it. CC has (had) a purpose which it fulfilled admirably. It should continue fighting for the rights of its users, not bending to AI companies and rolling out the welcome mat to rampant theft.

https://creativecommons.org/2025/06/25/introducing-cc-signals-a-new-social-contract-for-the-age-of-ai/

"#CreativeCommons (#CC) today announces the public kickoff of the CC #signals project, a new preference signals framework designed to increase reciprocity and sustain a creative commons in the age of #AI. The development of CC signals represents a major step forward in building a more equitable, sustainable #AIecosystem rooted in #sharedbenefits. This step is the culmination of years of consultation and analysis. ...we are actively seeking input from the public."
https://creativecommons.org/2025/06/25/introducing-cc-signals-a-new-social-contract-for-the-age-of-ai/

Ich habe zwei Fragen an Menschen, die sich mit #Urheberrecht, speziell #CreativeCommons auskennen:

Ich finde, dass diese wichtige Publikation hier eine große Reichweite bekommen sollte. Sie ist unter der #CC BY-ND 4.0 #Lizenz veröffentlicht. Damit ist ja eine Weitergabe nach Veränderung nicht erlaubt (ich verstehe gut die Intension dahinter).
Aus Gründen der Zugänglichkeit würde ich den Text aber gerne sowohl ins deutsche übersetzten, als auch die grafische Gestaltung vom Satz her überabearbeiten und ein barrierefreies PDF daraus machen.

1. Wie verhält es sich mit Übersetzungen bei Werken unter CC BY-ND (Namensnennung, keine Bearbeitung)? Gilt übersetzen als unerlaubte Veränderung?
2. Verstoße ich gegen die Lizenz, wenn ich den Text in neuer Form gestalte/setzte (als Grafikdesigner z.B. Schrift, Farben, grafische Elemente und Illustration verändere)?

@creativecommons

Flickr (which hosts the largest collection of Creative Commons-licensed photos in the world) has just rolled out Creative Commons 4.0 licensing.

https://blog.flickr.net/en/2025/06/18/creative-commons-4-0-has-arrived-on-flickr/

I use and support Flickr heavily.

This 2018 interview with Emily Richards (aka #MadameSnowflake), highlights a range of issues #ccMixter have had with CC-license compliance on YouTub. Things I hadn't thought of too, like how to detect posting other people's CC music as if you're the creator;

https://www.musicmanumit.com/2017/12/emily-richards-of-ccmixter-171231-music.html

Makes me wonder how all this could be handled on PeerTube servers, and other media hosts in the fediverse, to make the experience better for both artists and hosts.

This art is CC BY-SA 4.0

A WIP cover for the webcomic. Last thing I'll need to do is put the logo on the bottom and that might be it.